close
close
marcus mariota vs jameis winston college stats

marcus mariota vs jameis winston college stats

2 min read 22-11-2024
marcus mariota vs jameis winston college stats

Meta Description: Dive into the captivating college careers of Marcus Mariota and Jameis Winston, comparing their passing yards, touchdowns, interceptions, and more. Discover which quarterback reigned supreme in college football! (158 characters)

The 2013 and 2014 college football seasons witnessed a captivating quarterback duel between two exceptional talents: Marcus Mariota and Jameis Winston. Both players went on to become first-round NFL draft picks, but their collegiate careers offer a fascinating comparison. Let's delve into the numbers and see how these two quarterbacks stacked up against each other.

Passing Yards

  • Jameis Winston: During his two seasons at Florida State, Winston accumulated a remarkable 7,964 passing yards. This impressive total underscored his ability to consistently move the chains and put points on the board. His yardage was distributed across a large number of games showcasing consistency.

  • Marcus Mariota: In his three seasons at Oregon, Mariota amassed 10,796 passing yards. This significantly higher number highlights Mariota's extended tenure and prolific passing ability. His consistent performance over three years speaks volumes.

Winner: Marcus Mariota

Touchdowns

  • Jameis Winston: Winston's arm strength translated into 65 touchdown passes during his time at Florida State. This showcases a high level of accuracy and efficiency in the red zone.

  • Marcus Mariota: Mariota's accuracy and game management were reflected in his impressive 88 touchdown passes over three seasons at Oregon. This remarkable total is a testament to his ability to find the endzone.

Winner: Marcus Mariota

Interceptions

The interception numbers paint a slightly different picture of these two quarterbacks' college performances.

  • Jameis Winston: Winston threw 28 interceptions during his two years. This shows that, despite his impressive stats, he wasn’t immune to turnovers.

  • Marcus Mariota: Mariota threw significantly fewer interceptions, with only 10 across his three years at Oregon. His lower number suggests a more consistent and decisive decision-making process.

Winner: Marcus Mariota

Completion Percentage

Completion percentage is another key metric to consider when comparing quarterbacks.

  • Jameis Winston: Winston boasted a 66.6% completion percentage. While a respectable number, it indicates he may have had more passes that weren't completed compared to Mariota.

  • Marcus Mariota: Mariota displayed a significantly higher completion percentage of 67.9%. This shows his exceptional accuracy and his ability to consistently connect with his receivers.

Winner: Marcus Mariota

Rushing Statistics

Both quarterbacks were also capable runners, adding another dimension to their offensive capabilities.

  • Jameis Winston: Winston contributed 399 rushing yards and 11 rushing touchdowns during his time at Florida State. His rushing ability was a major factor in his offensive success.

  • Marcus Mariota: Mariota's rushing statistics were even more substantial, with 1,695 rushing yards and 29 rushing touchdowns. He was a constant threat both passing and running. His athleticism made him incredibly difficult to defend.

Winner: Marcus Mariota

The Verdict

While Jameis Winston had an undeniably impactful two-year career at Florida State, Marcus Mariota's consistent excellence and superior numbers over three seasons at Oregon make him the clear winner in this college stats showdown. However, this comparison only looks at college statistics and doesn’t account for the different styles of play, coaching schemes, and competition faced by each player.

Beyond the Numbers

It's crucial to remember that statistics only tell part of the story. Both quarterbacks possessed unique strengths and weaknesses. Winston's arm talent was undeniable, while Mariota's leadership and overall efficiency were noteworthy. Their NFL careers have taken different paths, showcasing the complexities beyond simple collegiate comparisons. This analysis focuses solely on the statistical comparison of their college careers.

Related Posts